As recounted in my last post ‘THE INTERSECTION,” Dad went back to the patent drawing board in 1998 (at the young age of 80).  He was intrigued by various developments in the America’s Cup race, and as a new member of the New York Yacht Club, he set out to prove his bona fides both as a sailor and as an inventor.  Accompanied by his usual gusto for going with what he knew.  Natch.

By 1998, there had already been four America’s Cup races since the New York Yacht Club lost it in 1983.  A new challenge was pending in 2000 and Dad wanted in.

The race in 1983 had been won by the yacht Australia II due to its specialized keel design.  In fact, when the boat was first brought over from down under, the keel was physically shrouded so that no one could see it!

What was the big secret?

The keel had wings!

Not to fly in the air but in the water!  For once, it wasn’t the Americans who came up with the next biggest innovation.  It was an Australian inventor named Ben Lexcen who had beaten everyone to the punch and opened up a new world of keel design.

Born in a small town in New South Wales, he was abandoned by his parents at a young age.  By his late teens, he was already fully engaged as a sailboat designer and manufacturer.  This lad was very mechanically inclined.

In 1982, he filed an application 85668/82 at the Patent Office in Canberra entitled “Yacht Keel With Fins Near Tip.” The purpose of the invention was an ingenious way to lengthen the draft (or depth) of the keel yet remain within the prescribed limits of the rules.

Sounds like a contradiction, right?  But it wasn’t.

Imagine that the prescribed depth of a racing yacht in a racing class was say, 2 meters, as measured from the waterline to the bottom of the keel when the boat is still and not tipping – as compared to racing in open water.  That’s the secret.  When tipped, the keel wings extend downwards effectively creating a deeper draft.  Just when the boat needs it most to counteract leeward drift (which reduces speed).

Interesting, isn’t it?  Here’s a diagram of the winged keel from my Dad’s US patent application 09/012,389 filed January 23, 1998.  Tip the boat in your mind and you will see that the wings create greater depth.

Wing Keel Figure 5

Here’s a picture of the actual keel from the winning Australia II yacht.

800px-Australia_II_winged_keel

Images courtesy of Wikipedia.

The reason Dad included this illustration of the winged keel from Lexcen’s earlier application is at the heart of the patent process.  This requires you, as the inventor, to cite relevant previous patents, and then argue as to why exactly yours is different; in other words, what is truly novel?  You need to convince the patent office examiner that, yes, your idea is different to a significant degree and is therefore worthy of a patent (a state granted monopoly extended to you whereby you are the only legal producer and seller of your invention).

Dad was convinced that novel keel designs were the key to future victory in the America’s Cup.  In his above referenced patent application, he made reference to not only Lexcen’s groundbreaking winged keel idea but to nine other inventors and their patents as well.

As Dad put it in the application,

“It therefore seems desirable to design new and improved appendages which are more efficient than the winged keel described in Australian Patent Application AU-A-85 668/82 and used in AUSTRALIA II which won the Americas Cup in 1983.”

Simply put, his idea was to use convex keel shapes that could be switched from side to side so as to force the boat into a more severe angle into the wind.  His invention described a process for shifting these shaped keels from side to side as the boat tacks from catching the wind on the left to the right and then back again.

The essence is that the convex surface is always deployed opposite of the wind.  Thus, geometry forces the boat harder against the wind, leeward drift is reduced, and relative speed is increased.

It’s actually the same physics that creates lift from an aircraft wing.

One day in 1999, out of the blue (as per his usual style), Dad sent me a copy of this patent application, asking for my comment.  I was amazed by the text.  Gone were the malapropisms, run on sentences, and overuse of “importantly” as a sentence initiator.  It was prose as artful and graceful as sailing itself.

At about this time (late 1990s, early 2000s), Dad signed up for a Team Hood yachting regatta in the Caribbean through the yacht club.  These were overseen by one of the most venerable names in yachting, Mr. Ted Hood.  Winner of the America’s Cup in 1974, Ted was deeply involved in the design and manufacture of racing yachts.  He had built Courageous in 1977, the winning defender in 1977.

Ted Hood in his prime.

Dad flew down to the Caribbean to grab the tiller whenever he could.  He knew that Ted shared a mutual interest in yacht (and keel) design.  So, when he had his chance, he bent Ted’s ear.  The latter, for his part, was impressed, and this led to their collaboration on a new coauthored patent application 10/226,701 in 2002.

Sailing 4

Sailing 3

Images courtesy of the Team Hood Regatta, Bernard Olcott collection.

Sailing in the Caribbean is not all about work, of course.  Here is Dad pictured with Penny whom, I am sure, he was prepared to enlist as wife no. 6 (stepmother no. 4 for me).  Penny was cute, but egads!  Enough already!

Sailing 5

My 4th stepmother, potentially.  One of several.  Image courtesy of the Team Hood Regatta, Bernard Olcott collection.

Back to the patent!  Listing Ted as the lead inventor, the new invention was all about edge.  Instead of wings or using aircraft wing shapes, now the keel could be rotated slightly to force the boat more fully into the wind.  Like Dad’s previous patent, this increased momentum in the direction YOU wanted to go and to resist being blown off by the wind.

2002 Patent

The ingenuity of this patent was, quite simply, emblematic of Bernard Olcott’s colorful life.  The wind constantly in his face, born in a lowly immigrant family mired in an incomprehensible Eastern European language, ruled by an overbearing father who berated him and his brother constantly; he had sought that edge in his life, over and over again.  Whether by education, the merchant marines, his mentor Hazard Reeves, society wives, or in a successful business, he had bent, rotated, shuffled, winged all edges within reach to his will.

This was Dad’s very last patent.  It was a suitable testament to his passion – in a hobby sense of the word – in life and the very best part of his character in his later years.  Also, of course, the opportunity to scope out babes.

If you are a female reader of the Bernard Olcott Story, please be on the lookout for my Dad!!!  Whatever you do, don’t go near the keel!

*   *   *

Today’s post is dedicated to Thomas Perkowski, a friend of my Dad’s, patent attorney, and client of Olcott International.  He made a special request for a sailing and patents story — voilà!

Advertisements

16 comments

  1. Nice blog, James! My ex husband and his family were very much into sailing. They had sail boats in Maryland. I remember watching the 1987 challenge. As you said, it was held in Austrailia. Cable tv was airing it live which was the middle of the night in NJ. I had an infant, my daughter, Michele was born in Sept 1986, so she was a few months old and up and all hours anyway. It was very exciting to see the America bring the cup back home!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I grew up in the ORC tyranny of deep draft, and even today, I sail a 7′ deep keep cutter, but yes – the wing keel was a revelation, and you’ve done a brilliant job of capturing the sense of innovation your dad was part of.
    The other aspect of charm I discovered about the wing keel was being run aground several years ago in a friend’s boat in soft even mud. As the tide fell, we simply stood level and had a very fine couple of bordeaux waiting for the tide to lift us off again!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. It took me reading the patent page scanned into the essay to get the concept of your father’s design. Some are thicker than others. Also, the boat we meandered around Sydney harbour on was a sixteen foot corsair. (I think it was called a corsair; fifty years is a long time.) Anyways, my dad would say, “Yeah, she’s sixteen feet only.” Then he would wag his index finger, wink and smile, “But nineteen feet with the tiller.”

    The concavity of your father’s design was ingenious, the wing would simply slide from one side to the other to deepen the keel where needed while reducing any drag, or “turbulence”, on the other side. Bravò on a great explanation of a difficult concept, James. By the way, Skipper, was that ingenious design ever used in the America’s Cup?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I have been asked a number of questions privately which I will address here.

    Q: Is it true that the rules state that the yacht is to be designed by citizens of the nation it represents?

    To my knowledge, yes, the boat must come from the country on whose behalf it represents. There were claims made against the Australian yacht on this point. They were ultimately rejected.

    If any America’s Cup experts wish to chime in, please do…

    Like

  5. Q: Does this mean that, under the America Cup Deed, yacht owners and clubs can’t hire H1B visa engineers to work on advancing their yachts and the art of sailing during this particular and very special competition?

    Please see Blithespirit’s comment above in that only 25% of the workers are required to be nationals, the rest are unrestricted. I would add that while H1B engineers are very well known to be prominent in the software/technical field, they are not known to be denizens of sailing tech. Any H1Bs out there care to comment? 🙂

    Like

  6. Also received privately:

    “Your dad loved people from all over and his life and work reflects it.

    But he also was an American with a healthy sense of national pride and patriotism …I think.

    Maybe you can recall some stories and messages from your dad that might be relevant to students and younger Americans today ?

    Your dad truly loved to ride the waves of life.

    Maybe this might be a wave worth riding, and writing about, during this important election year, when few are talking about the scarcity of American Engineers ….a species, I dare say, appears to be tending towards extinction ?

    Even Donald Trump, who speaks frequently about rebuilding American Factories etc and regaining superiority in this important endeavor, has not once addressed or spoken about the importance of American Engineers in achieving Greatness, and I strongly believe that we as a nation need to elevate socially American Engineers so that they are not living in the shadow of rap artists, singers, artists, and athletes and television stars who dominate life in America.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s